Intent-driven Development: Lessons from Claude Code
The shift from Spec-driven to Intent-driven isn’t just about new tools—it’s a fundamental change in how we approach software development.
rajatim
Intent-driven Development：我用 Claude Code 後的體悟
從 Spec-driven 到 Intent-driven，不只是工具的改變，而是開發思維的典範轉移。
Vibe Coding is Fast, But Fixing Chinese Localization Isn’t — Meet zhtw
AI writes code fast, but the Chinese it generates often uses Mainland terminology. zhtw is a CLI tool that converts Simplified Chinese terms to Taiwan-style Traditional Chinese — handling 400 files in seconds.
Vibe Coding 很快，但簡體用語改不完？試試 zhtw
AI 寫程式碼很快，但生成的中文常是簡體用語。zhtw 是一個 CLI 工具，專為 Vibe Coding 時代設計，一個指令就能把整個專案的簡體用語轉成台灣習慣。
AI Enters the Terminal: A Developer’s Guide to Choosing Terminals in 2025
As Claude Code, Copilot CLI, and other AI tools become part of our daily workflow, the criteria for evaluating terminals have fundamentally changed. This guide compares Ghostty, WezTerm, Tabby, Termius, and Royal TSX from an AI workflow perspective.
AI 進入終端機：2025 開發者終端機選擇指南
當 Claude Code、Copilot CLI 成為日常，終端機的評估標準也跟著改變。這篇指南從 AI 工作流的角度，深度比較 Ghostty、WezTerm、Tabby、Termius、Royal TSX 五款終端機，幫助你做出最適合的選擇。
The 10-Minute Value: What Does Senior Really Mean in the AI Era?
AI can write 500 lines of code. But that senior engineer spent 10 minutes reviewing it and found the critical bug. Those 10 minutes—that is where your value lies in the AI era.
十分鐘價值：AI 時代，什麼才算資深？
AI 可以寫 500 行代碼。但那個 Senior 花 10 分鐘 review，發現了關鍵問題。那 10 分鐘，就是 AI 時代工程師最值錢的東西。
2025 AI Development Tools Landscape: From Coding to Presentations, What’s Worth Your Investment?
84% of developers use AI tools, but research shows actual efficiency may drop by 19%. A complete comparison of the 2025 AI development tool ecosystem: Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Figma AI, v0.dev, and Gamma—helping you decide what’s worth investing in.
2025 AI 開發工具全景圖：從寫程式到做簡報，哪些值得投資？
84% 開發者使用 AI 工具，但研究顯示實際效率可能下降 19%。完整比較 2025 年 AI 開發工具生態：Claude Code、Cursor、Windsurf、Figma AI、v0.dev、Gamma，幫你判斷哪些值得投資。